The problem it fixes
Sound familiar?
- 01
Marketing says leads are up. Sales says they're junk. Both are partly right.
- 02
Your ICP is a list of industries and company sizes, not a reason to buy.
- 03
Campaigns target a segment instead of the moment a buyer starts looking.
What I draw on
The playbooks behind it.
Closed-won analysis
Find the segments with better win rates, shorter cycles, higher ACV and stronger retention than average.
Jobs to Be Done switch interviews
Rebuild each customer's path to purchase: the push, the pull, the anxiety, the habit, and the moment that made it urgent.
Buying committee mapping
What the economic buyer, champion, user and blocker each need to believe.
Frameworks are public. The harness applies them to your business using your data, your customers' words and judgment from three exits, then checks every output against the same standard.
What the harness does
What actually happens.
- Analyzes 18–24 months of closed-won and closed-lost deals
- Runs switch interviews with best-fit customers and lost deals
- Maps the buying committee and the proof each role needs
- Builds a voice-of-customer bank from calls, reviews and interviews
- Agrees a lead and account scoring rubric with sales
- The ICP is backed by data, not opinion
- Disqualifiers are written down
- Sales leadership agrees to the scoring
Related reading
Go deeper.
What you keep
Yours, documented.
- ICP with evidence and trigger events
- Buying committee personas
- Scoring rubric and disqualifiers
- Voice-of-customer bank
When it happens
Started in week 1 of the Fear Audit. Finished in days 1–30 of a fractional engagement.
Tell me what you're avoiding.
30 minutes with me, not a sales rep. You'll leave knowing whether your problem is strategy, systems or capacity, even if we never work together.
Book a call with Andrew